Tuesday, June 24, 2014


2 Rikers Island guards charged after sweep for drugs, weapons

Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - NEW YORK (WABC) --

Authorities swept Rikers Island Monday, searching officers and inmates for drugs, weapons and contraband.

Sources say two correction officers were arraigned on drug charges afterwards.

Investigators combed through inmate cells and common areas, as well as lockers and break rooms used by workers.

They searched about 100 correction officers as they changed shifts at the George Motchan Detention Center, and authorities say up to a dozen of them are now under investigation.

The searches began at the afternoon shift Monday.

The sweep is part of an ongoing investigation by the city Departments of Investigation and Correction into violence and illegal conduct at Rikers Island that has resulted in more than a dozen arrests.

(Copyright ©2014 WABC-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)

Prison to Pipeline Program

PRI's Prison to College Pipeline (P2CP) Program was featured in the New York Times in late May. The piece, "Prison Program Turns Inmates Into Intellectuals," examines P2CP's approach to bringing higher education to Otisville Correctional Facility under the direction of Bianca van Heydoorn (PRI's Director of Educational Initiatives) and Baz Dreisinger (P2CP Academic Director and John Jay College English professor).

Pictured above: P2CP's monthly Learning Exchange, which includes both inside (incarcerated) students, like Tomas Correa (left), and outside (community) students, like Ariana Castillo (right).
"Higher education should be available for everyone—for its own sake, not just because it has consistently been shown to reduce recidivism and help troubled youth become productive, contributing members of society. But numerous obstacles to higher education exist for that population. The few who traverse those obstacles are considered the lucky exceptions. Working at CASES enabled me to help bring down barriers to higher education for my students..."

Click here to read this full reflection.
John Bae (pictured above) is a graduate of John Jay College and an alum of the Pinkerton Fellowship Initiative's first cohort. John's piece is part of an ongoing series of reflections by Pinkerton Fellows and alumni. John now works as a Data Manager for the College Initiative, a partner of PRI's P2CP program.
Pinkerton Alumni Lunch. This month Pinkerton Community Fellowship alumni met with incoming Fellows to share their insights and experiences. Pictured above: Cohort 2 Fellow Milton Pelotte (right) discusses his work at Doing Art Together with Cohort 3 Fellow Marilyn Alvarado. Ms. Alvarado is just beginning her Fellowship placement with Doing Art Together.
PRI was proud to host College Initiative's annual graduation this month to celebrate its participants' accomplishments. College Initiative (CI) enables individuals with criminal justice involvement to pursue higher education. Pictured above are Michael Carey (left), CI's Director, and Kirk James, Director of the Fortune Society's David Rothenberg Center and the first CI student to receive a PhD.

Friday, June 22, 2012

NYC: Thousands March to End Stop-and-Frisk

NYC: Thousands March to End Stop-and-Frisk

By Li Onesto
June 17, thousands of people marched through the streets of New York City to demand an end to the NYPD's policy of stop-and-frisk. The crowd was very diverse, old and young, and different nationalities, from many different walks of life—reflecting a growing awareness of this issue and how important it is to take an active stand against stop-and-frisk.
There were civil rights groups, labor unions, student groups, teachers, nurses, Occupy Wall Street, immigrant rights organizations, gay and lesbian groups. By Friday, 299 organizations had endorsed the march, including, in addition to African-American organizations, groups representing Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Arab, Jewish and other ethnic and cultural organizations.
Some people talked about what stop-and-frisk actually means to the youth. A young Black man from Brooklyn said, "I'm here because of the issue with the cops, stop-and-frisk of minorities, African-Americans and Latinos, for no reason. They take us and search us for no apparent reason, just because they have a quota by Mayor Bloomberg. So I'm here to fight this issue and stop this."
Whole families came to bear witness. Before the march started, a mother and father held a large color photo of their son, beaten so bad his eyes were swollen shut. They spoke out in anger that radiated through the air, of how the cops had done this to their son, putting him in the hospital for four days. Then their son got up to speak out too, barely able to keep back his tears.

The Evidence Is In, The Verdict Is Clear

In 2011: The NYPD subjected people to stop-and-frisk 686,000 times. Nine out of 10 were not arrested or ticketed; 87 percent were Black or Latino. Black and Latino males 14-24 years old make up 4.7 percent of the city's population, but accounted for 41.6 percent of the stops. Since 2002, the number of stop-and-frisks has increased by 600 percent—4,356,927 people have been stopped during the past 10 years. By law, police must have "reasonable suspicion" that someone is carrying a weapon in order to frisk them—but a gun was retrieved in only 2 percent of the stops. (source: New York Civil Liberties Union)
In 2012: The pattern continues. Of the 203,500 people stopped in the first three months, 54 percent were Black, 33 percent were Latino, and 89 percent were found to be innocent. (NYCLU)
The most common reason cops list for stopping people is "furtive movement"—a catch-all term used to basically cover up the fact that the person was stopped for doing nothing.
If you do the math, this means a young African-American or Latino male in New York City will almost certainly get stopped by a cop before he graduates from high school. In this way a database is being created of generations of Black and Latino youths who are being criminalized. Walk down a street in New York City, stop a Black or Latino youth and talk to them. Some of them will tell you they've been stopped 5, 10 or 15 times.
This is a crisis: Hundreds of thousands of innocent people are stopped, interrogated, searched and humiliated by the NYPD for basically living while being Black or Latino. Sitting or standing outside the building where you live—constantly subjected to stop-and-frisk; where will it lead, will you end up in jail? will you end up in the hospital? will you end up dead?
Thousands poured into the streets on Father's Day in New York City to dramatically speak out with one voice that stop-and-frisk MUST END.
Stop-and-frisk is racist. It is illegitimate. It concentrates the kind of racial profiling cops do in big cities and small towns all over this country. And this kind of targeting of Black and Latino people, especially the youth, continues to be a major pipeline feeding mass incarceration. This is how we have gotten to a situation where the United States is the king of the world in locking people up—with its nearly 2.4 million people behind bars and more than 60 percent of them Black or Latino.
A Black boy born in 2001 has a one in three chance of going to prison in his lifetime; a Latino boy has a one in six chance of ending up behind bars. A Black man in the U.S. is five times more likely to be incarcerated than a black man in South Africa at the height of that country's segregation [apartheid] in the 1980s. (Benjamin Jealous, Democracy Now!, June 7, 2012)
A life can be completely ruined in an instant. You're young, you're Black or Latino. One minute you're sitting on your stoop or walking to the store—doing a "furtive movement." You get stopped and frisked. Some bullshit goes down and you find yourself in some crazy courtroom of injustice set up to send you to prison. Once behind bars, the guards can decide the tattoo on your arm means you're in a gang and put you in solitary and subject you to torture. If you ever get out you're marked for life as an ex-con—not able to get a job, kicked out of public housing, ineligible for student loans or grants, not able to vote. Millions of former prisoners are going through this. And if you add the families affected by this, we're talking about many millions more. This amounts to a slow genocide that could easily become a fast one.
At the June 17 march an older Black woman from the Bronx said, "They're killing the young people for no reason at all. And if they continue doing that, where are they going to next? This has to stop."
A young Black woman in the march said, "I believe that stop-and-frisk is all a part of the systematic demise to get young Black people into the system and disenfranchise so they won't be able to vote, they won't be able to make any changes in their future. It's all a part of the system."
Police beatings and murders steal young lives and the cops almost always go free: 23-year-old Amadou Diallo killed in 2003, 23-year-old Sean Bell killed in 2006, 22-year-old Oscar Grant killed in 2009, and 18-year-old Ramarley Graham killed in 2012. And just last week, a cop shot and killed an unarmed 23-year-old woman, Shantel Davis, in Brooklyn after she ran some red lights and crashed into a car. An all-American lynching in Sanford, Florida takes the life of Trayvon Martin. An endless list of lives cut down, taken away from their loved ones who have to get slapped in the face with the "explanation" that this was "proper police procedure" or "justifiable homicide."
Ask yourself: What kind of fucking system is this!!??
As Carl Dix said:
"This system has brutally and bitterly exploited African-American people since Day One. Now it offers no future for many millions of young Black and Latino people except for getting caught up in crime and going in and out of prison or joining the military and becoming a killing machine for this system. Mass incarceration is the system's response to this situation. This alone is reason enough to sweep this system off the face of the earth thru revolution. There is an analysis, a vision and a strategy for such a revolution, concentrated in the works and leadership of Bob Avakian."

Determined Mass Resistance

A "silent march" in 1917 was the inspiration for this year's Father's Day protest against stop-and-frisk. In July 1917, 8,000 Black people marched silently, to the sound of muffled drums, on Fifth Avenue in New York City to protest the increasing violence against Black people, especially against the massacre of at least 40 Black people in East St. Louis, Illinois, earlier in the month. The U.S. had just entered World War 1 and an East St. Louis factory holding government contracts employed Blacks. White people went on a rampage. The NAACP, church and other civic leaders organized the "silent march" to protest the East St. Louis massacre, lynchings, other racist violence around the country, and Jim Crow.
Ninety-five years later, we got a new Jim Crow.
In the face of growing protest against stop-and-frisk, NYPD chief Ray Kelly announced that there will be greater supervision of street cops. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has proposed legislation to reduce the penalty for possessing a small amount of marijuana from a misdemeanor to a violation—which would mean the many thousands now sent to jail for marijuana after being stopped and frisked would only get a ticket and fine. But these are just tweaks to a totally illegitimate policy; they aren't about getting rid of stop-and-frisk. Bloomberg said it himself, the stop-and-frisk program needs to be "mended, not ended."
Stop-and-frisk can't be mended, bended, tweaked or reformed. It must be ended,period. We need to continue to build determined massive resistance to stop-and-frisk, mass incarceration and all their consequences. And this struggle against stop-and-frisk can be a powerful part of the larger fight against mass incarceration.
*****
A Black woman artist talked about what she thought of the day: "It was great. It was a great opportunity to walk down Central Park with all these different organizations of people in silent protest against what's happening, and thinking about what the cops were thinking… These gatekeepers are still standing there keeping the gate… I feel like what I was marching for was the future. Because once we leave, we're going to hand the baton to our children. And do you want your children to be a gatekeeper for the corporations and the system? Or do you want your child to be part of the change?... Part of community and revolution versus part of the system that goes against that."

Photos: Li Onesto/Revolution

Prison Abuse Cover Up

By Richard B. Muhammad, Charlene Muhammad and Starla Muhammad Final Call Staffers | Last updated: Jun 19, 2012 - 10:38:13 AM
Advocates push for access to inmates and ability to scrutinize institutions


prison_coverups06-26-2012.jpg
Charnel Robinson holds a picture of her son Christopher, while standing with his aunts Charntae Robinson, center, and Chardel Lauchner, right, June 8 in New York. The city has agreed to pay $2 million to Charnel Robinson for the killing of her son at the Rikers Island jail by a cartel of inmates who sometimes acted as enforcers for corrupt prison guards. Photo: AP Wide World Photos
(FinalCall.com) - America’s criminal justice system today amounts to tougher laws, longer sentences, harsher conditions and little oversight. Advocates say there is a combination of almost unlimited power and too little transparency.

Problems range from depriving inmates of religious literature and denying religious practices to denial of medications and treatment as well as serious and possibly deadly beatings. Another issue cited is the use of dehumanizing isolations units, which keep inmates locked down for 24 hours a day with no human contact.
These conditions and billions of dollars spent by corrections institutions demand greater transparency and accountability, advocates say. California activists are backing legislation which would shine light on one of the largest prison systems in the country and end what they call a media lockout.
“Everything is we have to be tough on crime and tough on drugs and we have to be tough on kids and be tough on that, to the point where we’re no longer being tough. We’re just being stupid!” declared Ed Yohnka, spokesperson for the ACLU of Illinois.


prison_imates06-26-2012jpg.jpg
Inmates harvest potatoes at Southeastern Correctional Institution Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2009 in Lancaster, Ohio. Overtaxed food banks and underfunded governments are turning increasingly to prisoners for free labor to feed the hungry. Photo:AP/Wide World Photos
Kim McGill of the Youth Justice Coalition sees little hope for changes in prison policies and conditions without media and public scrutiny. California Assembly Bill 1270 would restore the media’s ability to conduct pre-arranged, in-person interviews with specific prisoners under the discretion of the Corrections Department and enable media to report on the prison system with greater balance and accuracy, say its supporters. The intent of the bill sponsored by state Assemblyman Tom Ammiano is to keep the public fully informed, make sure state institutions are transparent and accountable, and increase safety for inmates and system staff through media monitoring.

Prior to 1996, media was allowed into California prisons but an emergency internal regulation change ended access. Since then no reviews have been held or changes made, activists complain.
That means inmates face almost overwhelming odds to expose problems and protests, such as hunger strikes, and charges of torture and hellish solitary confinement, said Ms. McGill.
People need to see what overcrowding does and how bad conditions are, she added.
But the corrections department’s $10 billion prison budget, which has little transparency, is a major cause for someone from the outside to look into what is going on, the advocate argued.
“So the third largest portion of the (state) budget has no ability for taxpayers to monitor what happens to their money?” said Ms. McGill.
Taxpayers are funding prisons through sales and payroll taxes and should know what is going on, she continued. State budget woes are forcing renewed dialogue about prisons, money and resources spent on minor offenses.
With HIV spreading in prisons and other epidemics, family members and the society at large need to know what is happening, Ms. McGill said.
The state legislation, AB170, passed the Senate Public Committee and is heading to the Senate Appropriations Committee. If the bill clears Appropriations, it heads to the Senate floor and then Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk for signature.
Noelle Harahan, director of Prison Radio, which produces pieces from inmates by going into prisons and via phone, says a media blackout was used to help facilitate the explosion of incarceration inside America.
For the prison population to grow as it has, the voices of inmates had to be shut out so the public would go along with the propaganda of the political and ruling elite, she said.


mumia_file2c.jpg
Mumia Abu-Jamal
Consolidation of media and the failure of mainstream media to pursue these stories are also to blame, Ms. Harahan added. Her outlet distributes content to about 200 radio stations and is best known for bringing the voice of death row inmate Mumia Abu Jamal from behind prison walls.

Attacking the First Amendment rights of inmates of the last 30 years meant inmates were deprived of the “ability to educate themselves and to educate us. It had to happen for the state to get what they wanted, and to suppress opposition to mass incarceration and how they were going after communities,” she said.
Many states block inmate access to the outside world and with the complicity of mass media, these stories have been buried, she continued. The few courageous journalists were censored and telling these stories ends careers and shuts off opportunities, she added. But, Ms. Harahan said, with these stories told the public could have made better decisions about public policy—such as education versus public spending.
There is also no way to keep problems behind the walls, people come home and help create the culture of communities, she said. Just look at the negative impact of not having Black men around, Ms. Harahan said.
“We can’t be deluded that we’re separate,” Ms. Harahan added.
Once her group helped make Mr. Abu Jamal’s story public in Pennsylvania, the state banned in-person interviews with any inmate, Ms. Harahan recalled. The ban was really felt beginning in 1996 and 14 states quickly instituted the same rule, she said.
So reporters were denied access to inmates and inmates were moved to keep them away from reporters, Ms.  Harahan explained.
There are still ways to find and get the stories but institutions make it hard and there are negative consequences for inmates and journalists, she added.
Jimmy Thompson spent 22 years in prison and knows firsthand what transparency would mean for the men who prayed for his freedom and were left behind.
He is backing AB1270 as executive director of the Fair Chance Project, which works to free inmates denied parole long after their terms have been satisfied.
Prison officials want to keep the public out as much as possible to continue business as usual, which is to continue overcrowding dormitories and improperly feeding inmates, he said.
A typical breakfast can be a handful of prunes and French toast, “to two pieces of bread stuck in batter, burned and thrown on your plate. Inmates received a small carton of milk and on the way out, a bag lunch for those headed to work. The sacks included a small tube of peanut butter, maybe a packet of jelly and a packet of what inmates called bug juice,” he said.
“They went from bad to worse. Anytime they talk about the budget they take away from the inmates. ... Before I left I heard conditions had changed a little but at Solano Prison we had some 420 inmates living in a dorm designed for 164,” Mr. Thompson told The Final Call.
Dorms had 12 toilets for inmates and had no toilet tissue or paper towels, he added.
The perceptions inmates live well with three hot meals day, clean linen, recreation and watch TV, are lies, he said.
Grassroots activists and advocates also warn changing the way prisoners are treated isn’t simply do-gooding, most of the one million people in local, state and federal institutions are coming home.
The angrier and the more abused they are, the worse it is for the country, neighborhoods and communities.
There is also a trend of institutions to follow one another with policy and if California can change, it could spark other corrections officials to change or other activists to organize.
“We have people who clearly shouldn’t be incarcerated. We don’t really give any care, treatment or skills to people once they’re incarcerated so it just exacerbates problems for people who have learning disabilities or are mentally ill, and many of those people end up being disciplined by this over use of solitary confinement, which has these horrendous impacts,” commented Ed Yohnka, of the ACLU of Illinois.
He spoke specifically of policies at the Tamms Correctional Center in Illinois, which he said are being duplicated across the country.
Inmates are held 23 hours a day in solitary confinement with no human interaction, prompting a federal judge to note long lasting psychological and emotional harm.
Gov. Pat Quinn proposed closing Tamms to cut costs, which are three times more higher than other state facilities, Mr. Yohnka noted. But predictably, political leaders fought the closure, citing job protection and scary rhetoric like “keeping the worst of the worst off the streets.”
A Senate Judiciary Committee was poised to hold a hearing June 19 as The Final Call went to press on the impact and overuse of solitary confinement. 
On May 31, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a federal class-action lawsuit on behalf of inmates held in solitary confinement from between 10-28 years in the Pelican Bay State Prison’s Security Housing Units (SHUs).
According to Solitary Watch, a website dedicated to raising awareness about solitary confinement and other forms of torture in the U.S., at least 80,000 U.S. prisoners are in some form of isolated confinement, including approximately 25,000 in Supermax prisons.
According to Ruiz v. Brown, the lawsuit stemming from the July 2011 Pelican Bay SHU Hunger Strike, human costs are inhumane and debilitating, said the anti-prison group Critical Resistance.
According to the suit, the California Corrections Department reported more than 500 prisoners, about half of the population at the Pelican Bay SHU, have been in solitary confinement for more than 10 years. Seventy-eight of those have been in solitary confinement for more than 20 years.
They are cramped in concrete, windowless cells for 22 and a half to 24 hours a day, denied phone calls, contact visits, and vocational, recreational, or educational programming. 
In California, inmates can be put in solitary confinement merely based on alleged association with prison gangs.
But the media lockout is not just for so-called criminals, there are voices purposely shut out, say advocates and journalists. Guards make it very difficult by threatening prisoners, yanking phones out of the walls, transferring prisons who tell stories about abuses and keeping journalists off approved phone lists, noted Ms. Harahan. There are “real dungeons in the United States,” she said.
“There are people we should be able to hear from that the state is preventing us from hearing from for political reasons because they don’t like what they say,” said Ms. Harahan, whose website is http://www.prisonradio.org/, and an additional site http://www.mumia-themovie.com/.
In Colorado, Imam Jamil Al-Amin, formerly known as H. Rap Brown, is in a Supermax prison, 1,400 miles away from his Atlanta community, and supporters say he is a political prisoner.


jamil_al-amin08-07-2007c.jpg
Jamil Al Amin
He is locked down because of his history as a leading Black activist in the Black liberation struggle of the 1960s and 1970s, community organizing work in Atlanta, and his Islamic faith, they said.

Imam Al-Amin was convicted in the 2000 shooting of two Fulton County deputies, one died, in Atlanta. But Georgia handed him over to the federal government. He is serving life in federal prison without a federal charge, sentence or conviction, his wife Karima Al-Amin, an attorney, told The Final Call. He was moved without his family’s or attorneys’ knowledge.  Supporters are gathering signatures to have him moved back to Georgia.
The last time Mrs. Al-Amin visited her husband was mid-May. His visits occur behind glass. He receives two phone calls per month, each for 15 minutes. He’s allowed five social visits per month by telephone but absolutely no contact. When he’s in the legal room, they can pass notes through a very small slit, but he is handcuffed for the entire visit at his waist. His recreation is alone in what some would consider a dog pen to walk around in.
“By the time we leave his wrists are swollen.  It’s absolutely inhumane, even for them to have him handcuffed in a room with a little slit that you can get a few pieces of paper through. Even though they may bring food in for him to eat, he can’t even eat handcuffed to the waist,” Mrs. Al-Amin, an attorney, continued.
The Nation of Islam has a proven track record of a transformative work among prison inmates. Perhaps the most well-known example of the power of the redemptive teachings of Islam as taught by the Honorable Elijah Muhammad behind bars is Malcolm X.
Today there are continuous efforts to thwart inmates’ access to the Nation’s newspaper, The Final Call, and DVDs and materials by the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan are ongoing.
Dr. Ava Muhammad, attorney and national counsel for the Nation of Islam, has been actively involved in efforts to make sure inmate access to the newspaper is not restricted or banned.
In 2005 prison officials in Louisiana instituted a statewide ban on The Final Call citing what was deemed “objectionable material,” contained in the Muslim Program, published on the inside back page of the newspaper.
“The fear on the part of these law enforcement agencies, their representatives and correctional facilities is the opposite of what they say it is. Their fear is that Black men and women will convert to Islam while they are imprisoned as did Malcolm X and they don’t want that type of result to take place again,” said Dr. Muhammad.
The case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Henry Leonard, a member of the Nation of Islam incarcerated in Louisiana’s David Wade Correctional Center, was won successfully on the district court level and appellate level in the U.S. 5th Circuit Court. The state asked for the case to be argued in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
“Even as we speak, we are all waiting to see whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case. But there is a general problem coast to coast and the danger and difficulty is that many of the inmates who are in state correctional facilities are subject to the arbitrary decisions of local correctional officials,” said Dr. Muhammad, who also serves as national spokesperson for Min. Farrakhan.
In federal institutions the same problem exists, she said.
U.S. courts ruled decades ago that the Nation of Islam is a religion; but the movement is still characterized and categorized as a separatist hate group. This mischaracterization is often used to justify banning Nation religious materials to men and women in prison.
Dr. Muhammad said it is important for reporters to have access to inmates because of the public need to know what is happening in prisons, especially given high numbers of incarcerated Black men. According to the Justice Department, 1.6 million people were locked away in federal and state prisons in 2010. Over half million are Black men; just under 400,000 are Latino and about 30,000 are Black women and just under 19,000 are Latino women.
“Media attention is essential first of all just on bringing it into our consciousness that they are there. Because the mere fact they are there is a crisis, even if they were being treated well. When you compound that with abuse and mistreatment, we know about the Tuskegee Experiment,” said Dr. Muhammad.
“We heard Min. Farrakhan talk about the fact that when you are incarcerated you have to undergo a physical exam going into prison but you don’t take a physical exam coming out. So you have homosexuality, the spreading of the AIDS virus, drugs. You have all sorts of negative experiences that are contrary to human nature that a prisoner deals with,” continued Dr. Muhammad. Just the mental imbalance alone that comes with confining human beings to a “cage” are many issues that need to be faced, she added.
“It’s very crucial that media access be fought for and achieved, to put it before the consciousness of the community and then secondly to force a correction of it. There is a constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. That’s cruel and unusual punishment, some of the deprivations that take place. So many men are in solitary confinement for no clear reason and the list just goes on,” said Dr. Muhammad.

Friday, June 10, 2011

$72,384 to lock up youth

Number of the day: $72,384 (to lock up youth)

Photo provided by The Black Star Project

  
By Angela Caputo
May 5, 2011
  
That's how much the Illinois Department of Corrections estimates that it would cost to incarcerate each 15- and 16-year-old convicted of gun possession if HB2067 is adopted by the state legislature this year.
  
State Rep. Michael Zalewski -- along with some powerful allies from the Chicago Police Department
and Mayor Daley's office -- are trying to keep the measure alive this week before the clock runs out on moving the bill from the House to the Senate on Friday.
  
Under the bill, 15- and 16-year-olds charged with gun possession within 1,000 feet of a school or park would automatically be transferred to the adult felony courts. Under adult jurisdiction, those convicted would be required to spend at least one year behind bars, under a new mandatory minimum sentence that Zalewski ushered through the General Assembly last year.
  
Zalewski himself is the first to admit that the punishment is "harsh." But in our latest investigation, Without A Smoking Gun, he told the Reporter, "Chicago has a gun violence problem. Cops and kids are dying." Stiffer sentences, he predicts, would be a deterrent.
  
If 15- and  16-year-olds were automatically transferred to the adult felony courts, chances are the conviction rate would stay roughly the same. But the amount of time that teens are spending behind bars would grow.
  
A new Reporter analysis of court data found that gun possession cases are slightly more likely to stick if defendants are prosecuted in the juvenile courts. Roughly 37 percent of defendants either pleaded guilty or were found guilty by a judge between 2009 and the first quarter of 2011.
  
Meanwhile, 36 percent of teens facing the same charges in the adult felony courts were convicted in 2009 and 2010.
  
The major difference, though, is that 17 percent of the minors convicted in the adult courts were incarcerated, compared to 2 percent in juvenile court. Over the past five years, 49 percent of 17-year-olds were sentenced to prison. The average will grow to 100 percent under  Zalewski's measure, which requires all defendants convicted of gun possession post January 2011 will serve out at least 12 months behind bars.
  
There's no question that the higher incarceration rate in the adult courts could take potential gun-toting teens off the streets.
  
What may end up killing the bill is the price tag, Zalewski tells us. According to data compiled by the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authorities, the bill has the potential to send hundreds more teens into the adult felony courts each year.
  
As we recently reported, 315 minors (15- and 16- year-olds) were charged under the gun possession statute during 2008 in Cook County alone. Another 268 were charged with the offense in 2009. It's unclear how many of those nearly 600 arrests occurred within 1,000 feet of a school or park because juvenile court records are sealed. Seventeen-year-olds are adults in the eyes of the courts, and therefore we obtained access to those records. We mapped more than two dozen convictions from 2009 under the same statute among 17-year-olds and found that more than half -- 13 of 27-- of randomly selected convictions fell within that 1,000-foot range.
  
Had Zalewski's measure already been on the books, taxpayers would be on the hook for more than $1.4 million if just one-third of the 15- and 16-year-olds charged with gun possession in 2008 and 2009 were convicted.
  
Will the law actually make communities grappling with gun violence safer? Phillip Jackson, the founder of The Black Star Project, a nonprofit that tends to victims of gun violence along with young ex-offenders, doubts it.
  
"I don't care how many of these kids you lock up, you're not going to get rid of this problem," Jackson recently told the Reporter. "There aren't enough policemen in the world to stop this."

Friday, June 3, 2011

Calif. prison workers cheated on timesheets

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Calif. prison workers cheated on timesheets


Dozens of employees at a California state prison were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for hours they didn't work during a three-month sampling period last year, according to an inspector general's report released Wednesday.

Auditors found that one mental health employee averaged less than 27 hours of his scheduled 40-hour work week inside Mule Creek State Prison, which is 40 miles southeast of the state capital. Teachers spent as few as 33 hours inside the prison, but were paid for a 40-hour week.

"Many of the prison's mental health and educational employees were fully paid, but did not average working full days inside the prison," wrote acting Inspector General Bruce Monfross.
Taxpayers paid $272,900 for time when the 66 employees were absent during the three-month sample period from June through August last year. That's a rate of nearly $1.1 million in overpayments each year at that prison alone. California, the nation's largest state prison system, has 33 adult prisons along with work camps and juvenile lockups.

Auditors cannot say if the practice is widespread because Mule Creek is the only prison requiring employees to clock in and out.

"According to the security system's electronic data, most of Mule Creek's psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers regularly arrived to work late and left early, averaging as a group only 8.4 hours per day of their scheduled 10-hour shifts inside the secured perimeter," according to the report.
Union contracts say corrections officials aren't supposed to keep track of the hours employees actually work. Several employees told the auditors they understood, incorrectly, that their contracts let them leave early if they have completed their work for the day.
Others said they worked from home or reviewed inmate files in the administration building, outside the prison fence. However, working from home is not permitted and auditors said the file reviews did not come close to accounting for the lost hours.

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Undersecretary Scott Kernan called the overpayments "unacceptable." The department is retraining employees statewide and changing procedures to correct the problem, Kernan wrote in response to the inspector general's report.
Corrections department spokeswoman Terry Thornton said employees have not been disciplined, nor has the department tried to recoup its money.

"I don't know exactly why not. I don't think it rose to the level of misconduct," she said.
Thornton said the problems led to the firing of the prison manager, but a spokeswoman for the court-appointed federal receiver who oversees prison medical and mental health care said that was not true. Spokeswoman Nancy Kincaid said no one had been fired as a result of the audit.
Employees with short hours included 11 of the prison's 13 psychiatrists, who worked an average of 26 to 34 hours each week. They are paid an average annual salary of $245,000.

Of the prison's 31 psychologists, 26 clocked fewer than 40 hours. They are paid $103,000 annually, on average.

All seven of the prisons' $80,000-a-year licensed clinical social workers were short, averaging 28 to 38 hours a week.

All 12 teachers and all five vocational instructors were absent when they were supposed to be at the prison, putting in 33 to 39 hours weekly. Their average salary is $77,000.
The problem was not limited to employees, according to the report: The prison's school principal and two vice principals put in 33 to 35 hours per week. They are paid annual salaries averaging $89,000.